It was a fantastic day here, so I took the opportunity for a walk on the beach with the kids. When you live this close to the sea you can sometimes take it for granted and with thoughts of moving inland in the air, I am trying to make the most of it while we are here.
Anyway in between stopping the one-year-old eating too much sand and explaining the morphology of pumice to a 3-year-old I got thinking about art in nature. Here is some driftwood.
Here is some more
Art is where you find it OR it becomes ART when it is ‘framed’ in a photograph? I guess you could get into a whole debate over art photography here. If you look for such things there is art in nature everywhere so why is it art when its ‘natures hand’ but ART when reproduced by an artist? Here is the all-time clichéd example.